Aucune!

October 10, 2008

“None!”  That was the French prime minister’s response to Winston Churchill when the British prime minister asked where the country’s strategic military reserves were located.  

France had just succumbed to Hitler’s panzers at the banks of the Meuse River, where the Germans swept to victory with little challenge.  

France had fallen.  How could this debacle have happened? 

It had its roots in pacifism. 

Between WWI and WWII, the German people were dispirited.  Their economy was in a downward spiral induced by the fall of American banks in 1929 and the reparations they were forced to pay after WWI.  In addition, their quest for national prestige had been rudely interrupted when they lost the first world war (commenced when a Bosnian Serb assassinated Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary, heir to the empire).  As penance for their Neaderthal ways, the Germans signed a non-aggression treaty with their neighbors on the Continent and England.  The treaty subjected Germany to loss of a substantial amount of land, payment of reparations, a prohibition on annexation of other states, and a decrease in military forces.  The parties also signed a pact by which all would draw down their weapons and demilitarize.  The Treaty of Versailles fostered a desperate hope, carried by the toothless League of Nations, as well as people throughout Europe, that there would be no more war.  

And so, in the aftermath of WWI, an isolationist mood prevailed.  Charles Lindburgh and Joseph Kennedy were at the forefront of the complacency in America.  Their overly optimistic view undermined our national security, and the American public rallied behind public figures who had no stomach for another fight and lacked the vision to secure a real peace.  (Reagan’s “Trust but verify” would have come in quite handy here). 

As the decade wore on and the governments of Europe became populated with appeasement-minded men, Hitler rose to power in Germany with the promise that he would restore the country’s right to rule the world and recoup its losses.  Unchecked by countries which hoped against hope for continued peace, der corporal enthusiastically built up his military in direct violation of the treaty.   Those who were willing to see, saw.  The rest turned a blind eye.  While Hitler abolished democracy in his country, induced conscription, and strengthened his armaments, the world sighed and looked the other way.    

In its first offensive, the German army invaded Poland and not one country  in Europe lifted a hand to stop it.  The consequences of their indifference would soon confront them.  Czechoslovakia was next.  Then came Scandinavia, which had done its best to remain neutral.  France couldn’t be far behind and indeed, was defeated soundly and promptly by Hitler’s forces. 

These days, the soaring rhetoric of liberal politicans has convinced many Americans that the road to true peace depends upon putting down our weapons, hollowing out our military, and placing our trust in madmen whose life’s mission is to destroy our nation.   History proves otherwise.  When are we ever going to learn?  Their premise involves a high degree of moral ineptitude and naïveté, since ignoring basic human nature is what usually gets us into these predicaments.  

There are two important lessons here.  Democrats in congress are hoping the American people will forget and move on, never learning the truth about who’s responsible for our current economic mess.  But unless we analyze our past mistakes, we are doomed to repeat them in future.  

The other lesson is this:  Just because you’re a pacifist doesn’t mean your enemies are.

Entry Filed under: social commentary. Tags: , , , , , , .

12 Comments Add your own

  • 1. DarcsFalcon  |  October 11, 2008 at 3:10 am

    Amen!

    There is a bear in the woods.

    Reply
  • 2. Aspendale  |  October 11, 2008 at 1:48 pm

    I don’t get it. How is the current economic crisis related to military history? That’s a pretty big non sequitur.

    Wasn’t Jesus suggesting pacifism as the correct course of action? (‘turn the other cheek’, Matthew 5:38-42 / Luke 6:27-31).

    Reply
  • 3. joyouslife  |  October 11, 2008 at 2:15 pm

    The link between the two is this: whether it’s economic or military mistakes, we need to be able to look back and assess what went wrong so we can understand what not to do in future.

    No, Jesus was not talking about war. He was talking about personal insults. God loved David and considered him a man after his own heart: David was a great warrior who killed many other warriors. In fact, God directed Israel to wipe out heathens from their lands and take over their properties.

    Reply
  • 4. Aspendale  |  October 11, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    Jesus did specifically mention physical violence. I doubt that he’d want us to kill our enemies just because we’ve decided to call them casualties of war instead of victims of murder.

    Thou shalt not kill is also a commandment. Are we meant to ignore that? Should we find someone else willing to ignore that? I don’t see why we can ignore the teachings of Jesus when it’s suitable.

    Reply
  • 5. Aspendale  |  October 12, 2008 at 5:30 am

    Also, wasn’t France’s defeat more related to them relying on WW1 as a guide to war? They fortified the Maginot Line quite heavily, even going so far as to mount heavy naval guns, expecting static annihilation warfare (WW1 / trench warfare). Had Germany attempted to break through the Maginot line instead of going around it, they would have most likely never managed to successfully invade France.

    It’s also worth considering that the Maginot Line was constructed immediately leading up to the war (1930-1940). Not sure if it’s fair to accuse France of pacifism.

    Though the point about pacifism not guaranteeing pacifist enemies is valid.

    Reply
  • 6. joyouslife  |  October 12, 2008 at 11:31 am

    The commandment is Thou Shalt not Murder. There is a difference between murder and killing, as in war. Again – God Himself commanded Israel many times to go into heathen lands, kill the people, and take over the lands. This is just war. It’s all through the New Testament. Jesus did not contradict this. On the other hand, when King David deliberately set a trap for the husband of a woman he wanted to be killed in battle so that he could have her, the Lord punished him. Why? Because that was murder. Read the Old and the New Testaments. You cannot just use one verse to justify your personal dislike for war, you must take the whole Bible and consider that one verse against the rest of the scriptures.

    France had signed on to the Treaty at Versailles just as had other European countries and Britain. I didn’t go into it at length in this blog, but they all saw that Hitler was breaking the treaty by bolstering his military so that it was at parity with theirs, they knew (Churchill knew, and he made speech after speech) that he was making munitions and U boats, and, and Hitler even annexed Austira Hungary. They did nothing. The people of Europe, who had seen the destruction wrought by WWI, were not in the mood for another war. Nevertheless, the politicians had a duty to act against Hitler. They did nothing.

    Reply
  • 7. ProdigalKnot  |  October 14, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Sorry, but I have to disagree with the premise that God supports any kind of war in the New testament age. The idea that Christians should support and go to war is a Constantinian concept that has no support from the teachings of Christ. When the “church” aligned herself with the “state” in 313 AD the dark ages began and the “church” became a tyranny bent on converting everyone they “conquered”. Constantine led an army of Christians against Christians in 316 AD which was the first armed conflict between “believers” in 300 years. We are still trying to get out from under the legacy of that false Christianity where by government decree you became a Christian or were forced to leave or die.

    It is a complete misuse and twisting of scripture to use (as the theocratic Reformers did) the Old Testament as a justification for war and terror. Jesus did not come to judge the world, but to save it. The powers that rule the world are indeed ordained by God to maintain some semblance of order and law in a fallen world. If men weren’t fallen creatures there would be no need for government.

    True followers of Christ are not of this world, but are foreigners and aliens, citizens of Heaven, and thus cannot have any particular allegiance to any country or tribe.

    When one swears allegiance to his country, he must cast off his allegiance to Christ. Jesus said no one can serve two masters. Let the secular folk defend their lands and their God-given freedoms. True believers in Christ know that “we do not war against flesh and blood”. God is in control and we trust in His strength, not our own.

    Reply
  • 8. joyouslife  |  October 14, 2008 at 4:46 pm

    So if someone attacked your home and threatened your family, you would abstain? When Jesus said that we cannot serve two masters you take it to mean that we cannot be loyal to our jobs, our friends, our country?

    Jesus was saying that our hearts cannot be divided: If we love something else more than Him, it is sin. Again, you are using your person dislike for war to justify your version of one verse. You must use the entire Bible, new and old testaments, in interpreting the correct meaning of scripture. Pastors do this regularly. We must do the same.

    I rejoice in knowing that you know and love God. We will have to respectfully disagree on this point and, I suspect, many others. However, the fact remains that Jesus never asked anyone to give up defending their country for Him. Soldiers approached him for other matters – one would think that if he found their vocation objectionable he would have told them to their face to leave the army at once and follow Him instead. He did not. IN addition, that warring in flesh and blood passage is a reference to the fact that our enemies are not always flesh and blood, but invisible.

    I am a temporarity citizen of this world – just passing through – but I still have to pay taxes and do all the other things that come with citizenship. And that includes defending my country if it is attacked by madmen. God will give me strength to be courageous if that sorry event ever occurs, and the chips will fall where they may.

    We know your position now. Let us have enough of this contention.

    Reply
  • 9. fibrowriter  |  October 17, 2008 at 7:35 pm

    What Nita says, so say I. Unfortunately, I don’t have the scripture to back up my opinions. This was an interesting discussion.

    Reply
  • 10. Jeremy  |  October 31, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    I’m going to avoid comment on the theological issues being discussed only to say that it’s quite clear from any sober investigation into Christian teaching from Scripture directly and from the teachings of the Church that sometimes war is necessary and an act that any Christian can be a part of with God’s blessing upon that person. WWII was one such war.

    Christ was not a pacifist. He simply made a distinction between the proper actions of the Church verses those of the State. The Church were to feed the poor, baptize, offer Communion, etc. The State’s role was to tax and go to war, etc.

    Lastly, I want to say that I see the connection being made between a look at how France fell so easily and the current state of United States politics. If Barack Obama becomes president this nation will have a leader much more willing to let our military power slide than would John McCain.

    Peace through power. It’s not fun, but it’s effective.

    Reply
  • 11. joyouslife  |  November 1, 2008 at 10:42 am

    Well said, Jeremy. I appreciate your input!

    Sorry about the lag in timing, everyone, but I had emergency surgery and have not felt up to speed lately. Look for a new post within the next few days, though.

    NM

    Reply
  • 12. magus71  |  November 30, 2008 at 6:57 am

    Good post. The Democrats have convinced themselves that there is something prestigious about weakness. The French did the same after WW I– and paid in spades.

    Our enemies know that force works–we cannot afford to lose that knowledge ourselves.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Archives

Blogroll

Recent Comments